Showing posts with label Manifesto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manifesto. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

More postings on India Policy Institute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Private Truths, Public Lies

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arindam Roy wrote:

My other journalist friends would agree with me that a similar insecurity,
fear and frustration lurk in the minds of these politicians. How many times
such people air their honest inner feelings in private!

This is precisely what Professor Timur Kuran (our new Advisor) has
explored at length in his book, "Private Truths, Public Lies."

This is what our life in this world has become. A fake world. A world
where to preserve the rank and "social stature" of someone, or of a
concept called "government" we speak in whispers in our kitchens. There
are more than 10 serving or retired/resigned IAS officers on this list.
They whisper in the shadows. There are many more who are afraid. We are
all afraid. Of what? Of ourselves? Our shadows?

As they say, we have nothing to fear but fear itself. Let the truth be
broadcast on rooftops, from the radio, from the TV, from the internet.

[sorry; i'm actually killing my hands; must stop]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

No Good People Joining Politics...?: AR's Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Umesh,

Beautifully explained! I agree with you.

Regards,

Arindam Roy

-----Original Message-----
From: Umesh Tiwari 
To: debate@indiapolicy.org 
Date: Thursday, January 28, 1999 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: No Good People Joining Politics...?

Hi Arindam,

It is certainly okay for IPI or any such organization to bring people of
common interest together, all of whom should be considered good people
without any discrimination until someone has proven to be otherwise by
his/her own actions.

In fact it is rather dangerous to create some definition of good people,
or leaders. Natural leaders are the leaders you naturally know when you
find them around. One, although very very limited example of it would
be, say ,when you watch a group discussion organized for the purpose of
selecting a natural leader (for the limited purpose for a job
recruitment) among equally qualified, and knowledgeable people sitting
around a table. The recruitment managers just know within a matter of
less then an hour as to who can naturally command a leadership position
while everyone else would be willing to accept the position of following
the leader.

But in my arguments, I did not mean to limit leadership with this kind
of definition. A leader, in my mind, would be someone, who tries to do
the right things, lives life within his society in such a way that
his/her own example becomes inspiration for others, and he/she also
sincerely believes in molding public opinions about the things that
ought to be changed in the society, he/she does not hesitate to take
firm stand on what is right and wrong while staying calm and civilized.
That he/she gives a real sense of hope to others around, no matter what
happens. The list goes on. I have my wish list, you have yours, a leader
would be the one who can take both you and I along to follow him/her.
That is tough, but nobody said it was an easy task.

Television and media may create celebrities, it may help people form
opinions about someone, good or bad, but the natural leaders create
their leadership position themselves by investing their unique way of
life in it. A natural leader doesn't have to be the prime minister, or
the president, but wherever he/she is, he/she inspires a lot of people
around to follow him or his example to do the things his way, or
interpret facts about life his/her way. That's how I think we have
traveled thus far in our journey of civilization.

Thank You.

Umesh


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Problems do have solutions : Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Sanjeev,

I agree with you. Problems do have solutions. But many a times, we accept
alternatives as the possible solutions. In India, we have done this for the
past fifty years. The good, bad and ugly is for all of us to see!

Your suggestion on 'reasoned consensus...on social policy' is most welcome.
May be, we need to discuss and debate this as well (sans the 'noise').

I look forward to reading the Draft Manifesto. Suggestions, if any, shall
also be made.

Rgds,
Arindam Roy,


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

PUBLIC: costs of elections

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
    You might like to know that the "most comprehensive database on the
    Administration and Cost of Elections" has just been jointly-published
    on CD-ROM by International IDEA (Inst for Democracy & Electoral
    Assistance)
    Stomborg
    S-103 34 Stockholm
    Sweden
   
    Tel: sw=00-46-8-6983.700
    Fax: 00468202422
    email: info@int-idea.se
   
    However, you may first wish to check out: www.aceproject.org
   
    Orders for the CD-ROM to: International Foundation for Electoral
    Systems, USA (202-452.0804) or UN Dept ECOSOC (212-963.2916) or of
    course from International IDEA.  Name of contact: Therese Laanela.
   
    Please feel free to use my name in contacting them, if you wish.

Professor Prabhu Guptara
Director, Executive and Organisational Development
Wolfsberg Executive Development Centre
(a subsidiary of UBS AG)
CH-8272 Ermatingen
Switzerland
Tel: +41.71.663.5605
Fax: +41.71.663.5594
e-mail: prabhu.guptara@ubs.com
INTERNET: http://www.wolfsberg.com/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Rao plus Roy: Charu: AR

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Charu,

Very interesting!

You have rightly exposed the motives of the rich countries. This economic
(thereby social, cultural and political) violence is what we should be
cautious of. Has the West  become more ferocious, red in tooth and claw ?

I feel we should discuss this issue in greater detail and suggest
corrective measures.

Regards,

Arindam Roy

----Original Message-----
From: Charu datt 

"Prof. R. Jagadiswara Rao" wrote:

As I have no interest to make any "vigourous and precise critical
discussion of the working of the international institutions and their
relationships with India and other developing countries", such a
discussion is "sorely lacking" in my article. If that is so "vitally
necessary", why not Dr. Roy attempt it?

In continuation of my earlier posting on the motivation and workings of
international lending institutions, the following excerpt from a1992
interview with Noam Chomsky provides some useful material. The complete
interview is at
>http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/rab/rab-1.html



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1 out of 150: AR's Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Arindam,

I agree 100% with you!
Thank You.

Umesh

Arindam Roy wrote:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Umesh,

I agree with you. Many a times, people up there, on the pedestal are more
ordinary (or silly) than the most ordinary amongst us. We journalists see it
happen almost everyday. This is as far as your experience with Seshan is
concerned.

Yes, though we broadly agree on various issues, our individual perceptions
and sensibilities differ. Just as Sanjeev has suggested a para titled,
'Citizen Bureaucrats wanted' for inclusion, a similar para may be suggested
for the politicians, basis your point. Their freedom of expression (thought
& speech) may be independent of the party line.

My other journalist friends would agree with me that a similar insecurity,
fear and frustration lurk in the minds of these politicians. How many times
such people air their honest inner feelings in private! They too should be
free to uphold their honest views thru the media, if the party bosses ignore
their personal political aspirations, in the garb of partyline, party whip, etc.

After all, they should be allowed to feel that they are responsible to the
electorate first, the people who voted them to the Assembly or Parliament.
Their accountability should be  obligatory, statutory and mandatory.  And
the party should not interfere with this fundamental political freedom of
theirs.

Do you agree with me? This is for your kind approval.

Regards,
Arindam Roy


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1 out of 150: AR's Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Umesh,

You were phonetically more correct to spell my name 'Arindom'. Well,
that's how my name is pronounced in Bengali.

You are right to point out that we are nostalgic about the past. We tend
to remember the good things. Well, that's the selective perception of all
Good people. Perhaps Providence and Nature has its own laws !

By '...our father's generation', I did not mean just the generation(s) of
the past alone. I also said that our value commitments (not value
loadings) are eroding very fast. May be this was not very clear. My fault.

I agree with you. Lets take the honest people now. A friend of mine had
once said that the passive honest are more dangerous than the corrupt. A
dishonest man atleast does the work ( for a price), but the passive honest
neither take bribe nor do any work. They are anti-work, anti-progress,who
help in slowing down the prosperity of the nation. No, this is no argument
in favour of the corrupt and the dishonest. He said that we need the
dynamic honest.

A dynamic honest person is one who is prepared to take risks and still
remain honest. In today's India it is becoming increasingly difficult to
remain dynamic and honest. The shameful killing of a Christian missionary
and his two minor sons are a case in point.

Other than communal, religious and political issues, the anger of the mob
was directed at their dynamism as well.  Conversion was just a convenient
cause to incite the mob. This is a dangerous trend. Yes, the dynamism of
good people is being resented by the perversely corrupt.

No Umesh, I have not given up hope. Not as yet.

I, as a journalist, am perceiving a dark India in the twilight of
millennium. Some IAS officers,in private discussions, accepted that the
media's harshest criticism was for their own good, a guideline of sorts.
But when it came to action (corrective or obligatory), there was little
that they could do. Too many pressures (insecurity included). They are
frustrated.  Individually they are amongst the best brains of the country.
They are trained to tackle crises. Yet they feel that solutions are
slipping away like quicksand. They say it was not so five years back. May
be the past is always more rosy, but these frustrations and insecurities
are real as well.

One of them told me, off the record (about two months back) that he will
remember the grim Nineties all his life. (" En netao ki tanasahi sari
zindagi nahin bhoolonga", to quote his exact words.)

All sane people are pained. Sorry for the cliche, but there seems to be
absolute corruption though no single party has absolute majority.

How can I sing a happy song when there are tears all around me ?

Regards,

Arindam Roy



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1 out of 150: Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Arindom,

First of all,I find it very interesting to debate and argue the way we
are doing here, especially because no one, neither me nor you are trying

to prove a point here, we have our considered opinions, our own
perspective about this matter, and finally our goal is same, approach a
step closer to what finally we both would consider a better solution to
the problem we are attempting to define and debate upon.

Now to your point. I guess it is common human tendency to get nostalgic
about what we have left behind. For example, everyday when I sit here
several thousands of miles away from India, I guess it is the nostalgia
that somehow filters the bad experiences and allows me to live in a
wonderland, and I begin to see only the beautiful, lovely, rather ideal
part of what is my homeland, India. This, I know has changed very
quickly when I have tried to live there again myself, and every time
when I go on my annual pilgrimage to the homeland, I get a good dose of
reality that is somewhat contrary to what I think of it when I am away.

I wish to draw a parallel with our recent history and remind you of our
common nostalgia of history, where we tend to generalize that everything

that was part of the past generation was better then now, or everything
that happened in the previous generation was morally, ethically better,
or it was less corrupt.

I don't want to generally dispute your position that you find a lot of
"Corrupt" people around, and this needs to change somehow, but the
premise that when we were not around, or when we were too little to
understand all this, or when the media was not as free to report, or
when the definitions were rather different, the world was necessarily a
better place.

I sincerely want to believe that, I try to face the people of previous
generations who are alive and active and in positions of power, or
otherwise, try any means possible to get as close to the truth of the
"more moral" generation, and so far I have found it to be a mixed bag.
You rather get to pick and choose depending upon what inferences you
want to draw. So, I guess, my point is, even though our world is
difficult, but generalization of a generation to be better ignores the
wrongs that are in it, while it does not help in anyway to the hard at
work people of the present generation who want to hope against hope, and

want to change their world for better. They deserve some words of
encouragement.

On your point :
"... An example.The honest few amongst government officials, who still
do not take bribe, in cash or kind, do not mind a little 'Nashta-pani'
(tea &snacks). Our fathers'  generation  would have despised such
behavior..."

I disagree. Even if you start just with your own example as someone who
tries very hard everyday not give in to temptations like you described
above, then you have proven the above mentioned assumption wrong. I
don't want to blame the older generation for the problems we face,
although they certainly have a lot to do with it, but I do not hesitate
to claim that I am not corrupt, and I do not take "Nashta-Pani" and that

I believe in leading by example, and that I do take pride in the fact
that there are a few people in India, who wouldn't mind taking some
inspiration from what I personally stand for and do everyday. That gives

me a reason to hope. (I know you did not mean to say that everyone is
corrupt, but I am trying to show you the full side of the glass, which
is certainly half empty too!)

You can popularize something in a real, and meaningful way first by
leading by example, then believing that the world needs such people to
be effective advocates of good deeds, and someone needs to tell
effectively that it is still possible to stay honest and succeed in
life, and that doing some short-cut via corrupt channels to achieve
material goals means doing it at the expense of other human beings, and
that it is important for even a small segment of the society to do the
right thing even if others are not doing it, and that it is okay to
choose failure if the only other choice is corruption.

More later.

Umesh





--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hope and Trust

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Arindam,

You raise very interesting points. Before I respond, I would like to
quote a great statesman of this century, President John F. Kenedy of the
United States. He once said, "Ask not what the country can do for you,
but what you can do for the country!"

I have wrestled with these questions like "good people joining
politics...","mindset of the electorate..." etc. for a long time,
because, since childhood I sincerely wanted to be not an engineer or
doctor as traditionally my parents would have me dream about. I just
wanted to grow up to be a good man, and then do public service, perhaps
become a politician. I know how our society doesn't like brilliant kids
to grow up to become politicians unless they are total failures in
everything else and they have connections to be successful in the power
game. Well, my story is not important here, because people like me do
not have the basic fundamental right to participate in the political
process as my home constituency allows only people of specific "castes"
to become politicians.

Anyway, on the subject of "Good people" and "electorate awareness". I
would like to suggest you something that I have come to conclude. I
consider myself to be one of good people, and I am sure you do too.
However, it is perfectly alright for someone else to question our such
claim and demand to know us more if we claim to become candidates for
public office(s). So should be true for anyone else too. By this
definition, it is possible that there are lot of good people already in
public life who are not appreciated enough for their personal integrity
and dedication for (mostly thankless) public life.

I do not want to underestimate the gravity of the sheer fact that we all
know Indian political system could use lot of good people it is so
acutely short of. However, the solution has to come from inner call from
within the good people like you and I who should not demand the country
to be prepared for good people like us, or give "good people" some
opportunity. I would rather argue that without asking for some kind of
"job" or "success" guarantees, lot of good people just have to dedicate
themselves. I do not doubt our ability to succeed if we are ready to pay
a little price for the same. Lot of will fail, but that is not too big a
price to pay!

As for as "electorate awareness" is concerned. One does not have to
worry about electorate awareness in the short term when good people set
out to do their work in their neighborhood, in their villages, cities. I
believe real leaders have the natural ability to leave their mark in
people's hearts, and winning in the first instance should not be the
aim, because it is the process that is going to last after we are all
gone.

One other thing on electoral awareness. I think it needs to start from
our basic education system. At some level, some basic things about life,
liberty,freedom, our fundamental rights and public service needs to be
taught at our schools. Our social leaders, religious leaders need to be
involved in preaching to the faithful public that as citizens of a free
society, they not only have rights, but responsibilities to ensure they
are properly represented in their governments.

More later.

Umesh



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hope and Trust

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The Communist Party of India (CPI or CPM) funds party workers at
various levels for their time and effort spent in the party.  the
compensation may be paltry but ensures a decent middle class living for
these workers.  Why can't all parties adopt this system to ensure decent
people can dedicate their lives to the party which guarantees economic
comfort?.  This would mean proper party organisation which is publicly
funded and audited by its workers, something whichis sadly lacking inthe
party system in this country.

2. Follow up on this, why should party accounts be beyond scrutiny in
this country?

3. To me the lament that "good" people cannot enter politics today is an
excuse for the English speaking higher middle class.  Fact is, a large
number of persons who are engaged in the business of politics are good.
I meet a fair number of them in my work. Democracy means representation
and these people who elect represent the people who elect them.  Our
assembly/parliament structures and our tradition of public debate being
so poor , it is possible that these people who get elected do not
continue to represent the people's aspirations.  They need training,
which I find is sadly lacking ( Incidentally, Chandrababu naidu spends
lot of time in this training process, and atleast 2 of my MLA clients
compalin that they dont understand what he is talking about).  Train
them, teach them what is expected of them, tell them what they are
capable of the elected representatives can do wonders.  Most of them do
not even know what their powers and responsibilities are. We have to
develop institutional processes for this.

3. Good people also need good leaders.  People joined public life during
the national movement insired by the leaders and the personal example
set by them in various incidents.  Leadership of an inspirational nature
is lacking today because maybe the challenges are not there, as yet.  I
believe when the situation becomes "bad" enough, society will throw up
such a leader. After all , this all about Hope and trust , right?

Vikram


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No Good People Joining Politics...?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Umesh Tiwari wrote:
Hi Arindam,

It is certainly okay for IPI or any such organization to bring people of
common interest together, all of whom should be considered good people
without any discrimination until someone has proven to be otherwise by
his/her own actions.

In fact it is rather dangerous to create some definition of good people,

Dear Umesh & Arindam,

An effort of this kind has been started at the National level by
Foundation for Humanization. The first national meeting of this effort,
in which more than 60 organizations and other individuals are
participating is in progress right now at Bombay [ 27 to 29 Jan ]. More
meetings are scheduled for other parts of India - involving hundreds of
organizations. A meeting will take place in Delhi on the 13th &
27February.

More details are at http://differentindia.org/

It is very important that like minded people come together and start
working for a different India.

Peace, Force & Joy!
===========================================================
Sudhir Gandotra - "mailto:sudhir@netshooter.com"
COMMUNICATORS : Tele-Fax : 91-11-5535770 / 5613990
ICQ : 16733832     Internet :  http://www.netshooter.com/
===========================================================
  !!! Treat Others As You Would Have Them Treat You !!!
  "India can be different, if We are not Indifferent"
     Humanist Movement : http://differentindia.org/
===========================================================


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Private Truths, Public Lies

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very true Sanjeev.

There is one other problem with this private truth and public lies,
which is so commonplace in our land, that is, everything that is in
public, is seen with not just skepticism, but rather a sense of judgment
that everything that appears to be good must have some bad motive hidden
behind it.

Those who have been airing their "truth" in private have not helped our
society in any way, rather, they have helped reaffirm people's mistrust
in public officials. Those few, who dare to speak out, often lose their
sense of perspective, stop identifying themselves with common, ordinary
people, start believing that they are special, go to extremes and defeat
the very purpose they originally set out to achieve.

What is needed is not the zingoistic, and disparate moves to run some
kind of revolution or brand every public official as a liar, but rather
development of the basic social character where it is not okay to lie in
public or private, also it is not okay to speak against someone behind
his/her back, at the same time, anyone who dares to speak the truth
doesn't do so simply to expose someone or prove a point, but rather
because it is the right thing for everyone to do.

One more thing, I take issue with the traditional "Indian" thinking
characterized in your following statement :

"There are more than 10 serving or retired/resigned IAS officers on this
list  They whisper in the shadows."

Big deal! I don't mean any disrespect to the IAS cadre, but it is high
time "The IAS" came out of their box and became ordinary citizens, or
rather, should I say, it is the other people who should stop identifying
"The IAS" as some kind of superior caste. Given that having cleared the
IAS examinations itself is a proof of great success, but that is
certainly not the ultimate test of superiority, and there are those who
never get a chance to even participate in the process, moreover, being
good, and successful doesn't have to mean they claim superiority over
others (remember,there is something called modesty, which has not yet
been characterized as a bad thing!).

Another, rather moral issue I have with this "IAS" cadre, and that is,
if the Indian Civil service requires only a certain number of people in
the Civil Service, then does that mean every other smart person beyond
this fixed number of selected people is not as smart?

Moreover, the issue of "...they whisper in shadows!"

There are two things wrong with it. First, the "Whispering in show" is
accepted in our society, and those who listen to the whispers continue
to believe in these whispers, and don't dare to question the very
motives of such whispers and rather start taking their sides to crucify
the one such "whispers" claim to blame for anything.

We have some kind of "Caste System" virus, which has contaminated our
DNA's and that makes us create classes of people such as "The IAS", "The
IntellectualS","The English Speaking" "The Yadavs"...even those who
claim not to believe in the caste system in the traditional sense,
believe that anyone passing a UPSC examination is guaranteed to have
intellectual superiority over every other human being, or people who
speak English, or wear good western style cloths or have modern means of
commute, communication etc., essentially, rich enough to have all these
things, are somehow superior.

I am sorry to appear to be taking rather extreme position, I didn't know
a better and softer way to say it. I have been there, lived poverty, a
rural life, in non-English upbringing, all of which was/is considered
sin in our society. There is very little incentive for the ordinary
people to do the right things, we ought to concentrate on the problem
rather then fixing the symptoms.

Thank You.

Umesh



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Something for journalists to do

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Arindam Roy wrote:

Agreed. Just say when you are ready with the research findings. Whatever I
can do for you.

Rgds,
Arindam Roy,

Thanks, Arindam.

I have a request for journalists on this list (I had requested such a
thing earlier but no one could get the aswer that time)

Is it possible for you and other journalists on this list (Ash, Jal,
Ajay) to get the permission of their boss/es to carry out a simple data
collection project (not big research; only about 4-5 days work) on the
following lines:

A) Visit the MPs/ MLAs in the state/ central capital, randomly, through
appointment (you all have the press passes)

 * ask them how much it cost them to run for their
  elections

 * how much it costs them to feed the visitors who
  come to their residences

 * what did they declare regarding electoral expenses
  to the election commission

 * opportunity cost: what is the MP/MLA forfeiting
  by not doing his/ her regular profession.

B) Visit the dalals who organize campaigns for parties.

 * ask how much it will cost Mr. X to campaign in
  a constituencey of average size

   (include - vehicle hire/ purchase
     petrol, etc.
     payments to drivers
     cost of posters
     cost of big cut-outs
     cost of mike and other   
      equipment
     cost of wining and dining
      people before
      the elections 

 * cost of purchasing electoral rolls

 * cost of printing manifestos/ brochures

 * cost of printing party flags
 
C)  To countercheck the info, ask poster painters and others about
  the cost of making large cutouts and big banners,
  etc. Also check out the licence fee for putting these
  up.

D) Political party offices. Get statements regarding funds received,
 funds spent in day-to-day purposes, funds spent in elections,
 etc. Particularly ask the big parties how the aeroplane trips
 and helicopters are funded for the big leaders. Also find out
 how the funds are generated for 'party retainers' at the village
 level, i.e., those folk whose job is to carry petitions from
 villages to the MLAs/ Ministers.

E) Election commission or its rep at the state level.

 Ask for a copy of the detailed statements of account of the
 political parties and the statements of campaign expenses
 made by the candidates. Also complete copy of electoral laws
 relating to the survival of a party as well as the procedure
 to spend funds in a campaign.

Once the data is available, we can improve our analysis and find out if
it is indeed possible for any honest person to contest elections in
India. In fact, Times of India should already have data on these issues.
Please check out with the experts on elections in your newspaper/
organization and see if we can make a sound study of this critical
issue.

In fact, such research could also be carried out by the institutes with
us, such as the Liberty Institute. We need excellent analysis of this
issue before we make the firm claim that honest people cannot enter
Indian governance.

Thanks,

Sanjeev






--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by at 2 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Some postings on India Policy Institute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

1 out of 150: Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Sanjeev,

I was away on assignment to the mela area for coverage. Sorry for the
delay.

First and foremost, get well soon. We are already missing your
perceptive moderation.

About my entering politics: Good tomatoes and bad tomatoes are
segregated by the vegetable seller. In the same market, bad tomatoes (or bad cars)
have lower price. But not so in politics, unfortunately. Criminalisation of
politics began (or was perceived) from emergency imposed by Indira
Gandhi.

These bad elements are entrenched in our system. Willy-nilly, even the
so-called good (Mr/Ms Clean) in today's politics, Manmohan Singh or Atal
Bihari Vajpayee have to look the other way. They seem to lack the dynamism
needed to counter the 'bad' elements. There are no role-models in today's
politics. Or no peer pressure on the bad from the politicians
themselves.

We need to correct the perception of politics and politicians before a
good man can convert his goodness to votes. People do not just exercise their
choice, most often they are made to exercise their choice. A good man
would not know how to counter false propoganda, mud slinging, et al. He would
be shocked into his shell. I have seen this happen.

A good guy will not hire hoodlums to capture booths, change ballot
boxes, etc. He cannot motivate bureaucrats to rig election in his favour. He
will not use transfer and promotions as political weapon. Who will help him?

Even the media barons are bought and sold by politicians. Their dynamism is
mind boggling. Unfortunately, the brand loyalty of the 'bad' is stronger.
This is the case in Hindi heartland.

Cost of election is a major factor as well. Though my wife tells me that
cost is not a major factor. She is a teacher in a girls' school. She says
that she would prefer social work to politics. I as a journalist would like
to collect news, not become news myself!

Yes it is possible for me to do a research on the politicians/election
system. This has to be done discreetly. Information will trickle in.
These have to be gathered like a bee collects honey. I will do my best. More
later.

Rgds,
Arindam Roy,


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

1 out of 150: AR's Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Umesh,

I agree with you. Many a times, people up there, on the pedestal are more
ordinary (or silly) than the most ordinary amongst us. We journalists see it
happen almost everyday. This is as far as your experience with Seshan is
concerned.

Yes, though we broadly agree on various issues, our individual perceptions
and sensibilities differ. Just as Sanjeev has suggested a para titled,
'Citizen Bureaucrats wanted' for inclusion, a similar para may be suggested
for the politicians, basis your point. Their freedom of expression (thought
& speech) may be independent of the party line.

My other journalist friends would agree with me that a similar insecurity,
fear and frustration lurk in the minds of these politicians. How many times
such people air their honest inner feelings in private! They too should be
free to uphold their honest views thru the media, if the party bosses ignore
their personal political aspirations, in the garb of partyline, party whip, etc.
After all, they should be allowed to feel that they are responsible to the
electorate first, the people who voted them to the Assembly or Parliament.
Their accountability should be  obligatory, statutory and mandatory.  And
the party should not interfere with this fundamental political freedom of
theirs.

Do you agree with me? This is for your kind approval.

Regards,
Arindam Roy

======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arindam,

I think there is widespread agreement about the deteriorating state of our social,
moral , and ethical values, and most of what you said is not in dispute.
Each one of us can associate ourselves with this grim reality if we happen to know
anything about present day India. When you say the following :

"How can I sing a happy song when there are tears all around me ?"

I think I can relate to it. This sad reality is just the sad reality of our own
society, debates cannot justify facts otherwise. All of us feel bad about it. But
some of us must overcome the pain and look for reasons to keep hope alive.

Just as we are less then perfect in reporting about facts in news media these days,
we have been equally irresponsible about recording our own recent history
which would show clearly that until even this 20th
century, killings and murders on the basis of caste and religions were
not just some academic statistics, but there were real faces of people
who could not live their lives because others thought they didn't
deserve to live. We only remember the generalized sweeping reforms such
as Gandhian revolution that marked the beginning of the end of
untouchability, but thousands, or perhaps millions of those who suffered
while the practice was prevalent, largely got ignored by historians or
became parts of some generalized statistics. If we care to recall the
past with our own life experiences, I think we are getting better, even
though some things might at the same time, be getting out of control
unless checked soon enough.

On your example of the plight of the civil servants. What you said is
generally true, except for the fact that, there is,though very
insignificant, nonetheless, other side of the coin. Politicians are
generally considered corrupt, and Civil servants, the bureaucrats are
generally considered more educated, morally and ethically better, and
still, most of the times, frustrated because of not being able to do
what they consider to be the best thing for the country. Facts generally
support this assumption, and therefore, there is nothing wrong with
being compassionate about this issue.

However, there is another part, which could be termed as a sort of
"superiority complex" that many of our bureaucrats go through believing
they deserve more respect and power then the "Doti clad", less educated,
and often not that sophisticated politicians. If I may guess, there is
perhaps some passed on legacy of british colonialism in it.

Anyway, rather then generalizing on issues, and believing on someone's
opinions, no matter whether the individual is a Civil servant or a
political activist, I prefer getting closer to individual facts and
forming opinions purely on the basis of facts rather then where it came
from.

I have a very good example of a famous bureaucrat, who has done wonders
for India. I think you know the name of Mr. T.N. Seshan, the firebrand
former Chief Election Commissioner of India, who is rightly recognized
for overhauling the election commission and with his firm,though
somewhat high-handed approach, he managed to return people's faith in
one of the basic foundations of our democracy. He was awarded the famous
Megaseysey award.

This famous Mr. Seshan came to the United States couple of years ago.
Before that, there were rumors about him running for the Presidential
elections, and Bal Thakre of Shiv Sena had already offered his support
etc. Just like millions of Indians who followed his tenure as CEC, I too
was sort of a fan of Mr. Seshan until I got a chance to see him speak
his mind.

I had known all along that though the integrity of this gentleman could
not be questioned, but he seldom believed in other people's ability to
do the right things. In his club, he is a dictator, and only he is right
all the time. Knowing that I took interest in matters related to India,
I was summoned to participate in this get together where Mr. Seshan was
to speak.

We, as a community, being so hungry of Charismatic leaders in our
society after the demise of the Nehru Dynasty, the hosts left no stone
unturned in trying to praise Mr. Seshan. There was even explicit demand
stated by every speaker who spoke before and after him, about conferring
"Bharat Ratna" to him.

Mr. Seshan starts to speak, and he clarifies that he hates
environmentalists like Medha Patkar etc. who are creating troubles in
implementation of Narmada Projects etc. Till that point it was all
right, then Mr. Seshan goes on to the extent of not recognizing the
territorial sovereignty of Pakistan while trying to suggest that there
is land on that part of the world that belongs to India (not talking
about Kashmir here). Finally comes the point of question answer
sessions, after he himself had clearly stated in his speech, rather
arrogantly that every politician of our land is corrupt, and he hated
every political party as well as politician, and that he deserved to be
either the President or the Prime Minister of India (by this time I was
thoroughly puzzled and started wondering whether Mr. Seshan believed in
our democratic system or not!)

Anyway, I submit my question to him, which was skipped by the moderator
in an effort to filter out difficult questions. Then I got a chance to
confront him and directly ask. Since he himself expressed his desire to
be either the Prime Minister or the President of India, and despite such
vast pool of talent in India, which is famous for its achievements in
the fields of Information Technology, Science, Engineering etc. around
the globe, and not much of that talents goes towards the profession of
politics, why doesn't he, him being the rare personality who has done so
much for India, take on the task of encouraging new generation to join
politics and clean up our democracy?

His simple answer was, "For that to happen, I am going to have to join politics!"

His one line remark had told me a lot, lot about his personal beliefs,
his lack of respect for the democratic institutions. It was almost
frightening to see such a popular national figure, a darling of
millions, make generalized statements about politics and politicians,
had such unsophisticated opinions about neighboring countries, and yet
he almost demanded that he deserved to be the Prime Minister or the
President of India.

Our system is bad enough, we don't need to form sweeping opinions as to
whether Civil Servants are morally better then the politicians or the
politicians are generally corrupt. Every time such a generalization is
made, my heart goes to the politicians I personally have been following
for years, and who are sort of my heroes, who go on doing their duty,
for they believe in our system of democracy and care enough about the
poor and ignored.

Thank You.

Umesh



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CITIZEN bureaucrats wanted

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Arindam Roy wrote:
Some IAS officers,in private discussions, accepted that the
media's harshest criticism was for their own good, a guideline of sorts.
But when it came to action (corrective or obligatory), there was little
that they could do. Too many pressures (insecurity included). They are
frustrated.  Individually they are amongst the best brains of the country.
They are trained to tackle crises. Yet they feel that solutions are
slipping away like quicksand.

For inclusion in manifesto under Governance

"Bureaucrats in free India will be CITIZEN bureaucrats. They will have
rights to speak out as citizens, both on general issues of governace as
well as on the private secrets of political leaders, which are not
covered under the Official Secrets Act. They wll not merely watch as
helpless spectators of the decadence they observe around themselves. If
they do so they would be discharged from service once their connivance
is discovered. To allow a corrupt Minister to linger on in power through
negligence to build a case and to inform the people, is a crime and
would be treated as such."

for approval.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

National Debate

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Sanjeev,

The profound debate on National Policy is most illuminating. I agree
with Swaminathan Aiyar that economists, world over, by and large have
failed.

There is more to system correction, that needs to be dealt with at the
grass root level. I am sure that you must have tackled the subject of
integrity, individual and collective, before in great detail. Pardon my
ignorance as a new entrant. As a journalist, I confront these problem
almost everyday.

Take local bodies for example. The Panchayats have some powers, but all
these are on paper alone. The village landlord and/or moneylender still
calls the shot. Except in some villages in Rajasthan and Gujrath (plus a
few exceptions in Bengal and Kerela), in most of our villages, things
haven't changed much. In the Hindi heartland, particularly Bihar and UP,
the shackles of caste and class is too strong. And to punish the poor
(often Dalits), their women are molested, raped, paraded naked in the
villages and stoned, by the feudal lords.

Next, this terror is utilised by these landlords during elections in the
country. Government servants, who go on election duties have,
off-the-record, told me that they had been advised by the 'Mukhia's men'
to cooperate, otherwise.... No one dare oppose these hoodlums. For this
favour, the poll party is taken care of (good food and other 'Sewa'). In
some places, the ballot papers are stamped and put in the ballot boxes,
the previous night, or early morning. The 'Sarkari babus' sign on the
dotted lines, and prefer to forget the experience.

In moufisil towns things are no better. In cities, the municipal bodies
and corporations are in bad shape. The Development Authorities have
become a cess pool of corruption. Nothing seems to work. For doing the
job, most government servants are supposed to do, bribes are demanded
and given openly.

All our laws are obsolete. The mind set is to make a fast buck, no
matter how. Even in relatively nobler professions, corruption has seeped
in. In UP and Bihar, quite a few journalists collect 'Hafta' from the
police stations. Similarly, doctors and the judicial services,
particularly at the lower level, have less credibility. It is a sad
situation.

How are we supposed to tackle with these problems?

Rgds,
Arindam Roy,
arindam@nde.vsnl.net.in


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1 out of 150: Reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Postings not related to the writing of the Manifesto or policy chapters
are likely to be summarily rejected. Thanks for your understanding. IPI
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Umesh,

Thanks for your reply.

I agree with you. In fact, both of us are saying similar (though not the
same) thing.  When I said that often Good people have to look the other
way, I did not imply (or want to imply) that such people are powerless. In
a way, their tolerance for the Bad expands.

An example.The honest few amongst government officials, who still do not
take bribe, in cash or kind, do not mind a little 'Nashta-pani' (tea
&snacks). Our fathers'   generation  would have despised such behaviour. To
them even this was bribe, but not so any longer. Next, various arguments are
forwarded by these so-called good people like 'Sanskar', 'Sistachar', etc.
Thus, what was poison for one generation is food for another. I had several
such experiences.

While we are talking of TQM , ISO, etc in various other areas world over, we
seem to have settled for a lower value in our day to day life. To my mind,
human ethics perched techno-ethics and in fact are more important. This
concept needs to be popularised in public life for a meaningful condition,
and  a pre requisite for a better election system, etc.

Sorry for the delay in replying. Your note caught me in a busy schedule.

Regards,
Arindam Roy



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform.       debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives:            http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)